Defendant Physical Disability and Sentencing in Criminal Cases
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Research has consistently produced evidence of negative attitudes toward persons with both physical and psychiatric disabilities [1-5]. In general, attitudes toward persons with physical disabilities are more positive than attitudes toward persons with psychiatric disabilities [6-8]. Forensic research tends to focus on individuals with psychiatric disabilities as perpetrators of crime [9-10] and those with physical disabilities as victims of crime [11-13]. Gradually becoming noticed is the notion of fear of crime and of groups who show fear of victimization. One group that has been rarely studied comprises individuals who have physical disabilities. Research has suggested that having a physical disability is a significant predictor of reporting fear of crime [13] and crimes against individuals with disabilities are underreported and under enforced [11-12]. However, individuals with disabilities are overrepresented in the criminal justice system [14-17].
منابع مشابه
Inherited proclivity: When should neurogenetics mitigate moral culpability for purposes of sentencing?
Certain genes and neurobiology ('neurogenetics') may predispose some people to violent behavior. Increasingly, defendants introduce neurogenetic evidence as a mitigating factor during criminal sentencing. Identifying the cause of a criminal act, biological or otherwise, does not necessarily preclude moral or legal liability. However, valid scientific evidence of an inherited proclivity sometime...
متن کاملThe criminal defendant with identified mental disorder.
Personal characteristics of criminal defendants including sex,1 age and education,2 and race have been shown to relate to outcome of the defendant's contact with the criminal justice system. Whether mental disorder relates to outcome is uncertain, although there is anecdotal evidence to suggest that in some cases judges may be influenced by a history of mental disorder to acquit the gUilty. 4 W...
متن کاملReassessing and Redirecting Research on Race and Sentencing*
A large portion of research on criminal sentencing over the past few decades has focused on the role of defendant race. The modal approach has encompassed regression-based studies of whether defendant race exerts a main effect on imprisonment decisions. Recent studies have employed more sophisticated statistical models, have incorporated information on both race and ethnicity, and have increasi...
متن کاملPerceived Stereotypicality of Black Defendants Predicts Capital-Sentencing Outcomes
Researchers previously have investigated the role of race in capital sentencing, and in particular, whether the race of the defendant or victim influences the likelihood of a death sentence. In the present study, we examined whether the likelihood of being sentenced to death is influenced by the degree to which a Black defendant is perceived to have a stereotypically Black appearance. Controlli...
متن کاملA Comparison of Sentencing Outcomes for Defendants with Public Defenders Versus Retained Counsel in a Florida Circuit Court
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that a criminal defendant has the right to counsel for his defense, and the Fourteenth Amendment states that defendants must be provided due process and equal protection under law. Despite this, it is unclear whether indigent defendants in the United States-who are disproportionately ethnic minorities-are receiving such protections when it com...
متن کامل